Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃悰 ClusterClass: Fix defaulting of nullable variables #5773

Merged

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Stefan B眉ringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR changes our defaulting code so it's also able to default nullable variables.

Split out of https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/5764/files

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 2, 2021
Signed-off-by: Stefan B眉ringer buringerst@vmware.com
if err != nil {
return field.ErrorList{field.Invalid(fldPath, "",
fmt.Sprintf("failed defaulting variable %q: %v", clusterVariable.Name, err))}
// If the schema has a default value, default it.
Copy link
Member Author

@sbueringer sbueringer Dec 2, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please note:
I dropped the usage of the structural lib for now, but I will re-introduce it with the support for object and arrays. It's just that with the bugfix for nullable variable we don't need it anymore for basic types.

And it's hard to explain how structural lib and this bugfix would work together without other corresponding changes which are needed for objects/arrays.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @fabriziopandini @vincepri

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

flake
/retest

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6b897de into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.1 milestone Dec 2, 2021
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-default-nullable-variables branch December 2, 2021 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants