Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃尡 Enable more gocritic lint checks #5843

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2021

Conversation

stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

There are a multiple groups of checks run by gocritic. Some are enabled
by default, but others require explicit enabling. This enables the
experimental group, minus a few exceptions that would either be too
disruptive or are things we aren't concerned about.

One of the main benefits of this extra coverage is the flagging of using
the deprecated ioutil package.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #4419

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 9, 2021
@stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx!
2 nits otherwise lgtm

test/infrastructure/docker/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
There are a multiple groups of checks run by gocritic. Some are enabled
by default, but others require explicit enabling. This enables the
experimental group, minus a few exceptions that would either be too
disruptive or are things we aren't concerned about.

One of the main benefits of this extra coverage is the flagging of using
the deprecated ioutil package.

Signed-off-by: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2021
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 10, 2021
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 755782f into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.1 milestone Dec 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add linter to prevent use of deprecated ioutil module
6 participants