Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Make Topology controller authoritative on MachineDeployment failuredomain #5950

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

Make the Topology/Cluster controller authoritative over the failuredomain path in a machineDeployment spec.template.spec during reconciliation.

Authoritative control by the Controller mean a user change to remove it from the Cluster.spec.topology.machineDeploymentTopology is reflected in the updated object.

…main

Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon <kmuldoon@vmware.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 18, 2022
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title Make Topology controller authoritative on MachineDeployment failuredomain :bug Make Topology controller authoritative on MachineDeployment failuredomain Jan 18, 2022
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title :bug Make Topology controller authoritative on MachineDeployment failuredomain 🐛 Make Topology controller authoritative on MachineDeployment failuredomain Jan 18, 2022
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!
Worked on my machine :)

/lgtm

PTAL @fabriziopandini

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 18, 2022
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice finding!
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3e61b3f into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.1 milestone Jan 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants