Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Use CreateAndWait in MP ScaleFromZero test #8927

Merged

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

Add an eventually to the test Should delete retired nodes when scaled to zero for the MachinePool reconciler. This started flaking recently, likely due to changes in the use of the clusterCacheTracker in this reconciler.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 27, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 27, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/area testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing label Jun 27, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 27, 2023
Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon <kmuldoon@vmware.com>
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retitle 🐛 Use CreateAndWait in MP ScaleFromZero test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title 🐛 Add eventually to MP reconcile test 🐛 Use CreateAndWait in MP ScaleFromZero test Jun 27, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

Test green for me with ~30K runs on my machine. I caught the flake in action and it seems like it was down to the node not being available when reconcile was called.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 27, 2023
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice fix, and huge kudos for the relentless work on flakes
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 7d95ba733015718d3919a84db494ecd48a71629b

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2b0dd2e into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 27, 2023
23 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.5 milestone Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants