Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0.6] 🐛 Controller.Watch() should not store watches if already started #1165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2020

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Member

The controller internal struct holds a list of watches
(as []watchDescription) when someone calls .Watch() to then start the
watches and informers once we're ready to call Start().

This behavior caused a memory leak in the case Watch was called after
a controller has already been started and if the source.Kind's cache was
either stopped or not available any longer. The leak was caused by the
watches internal slice holding on to all references to each watch ever
issued (and their respective caches).

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano vincepri@vmware.com

/assign @alvaroaleman
/milestone v0.6.x

The controller internal struct holds a list of watches
(as []watchDescription) when someone calls .Watch() to then start the
watches and informers once we're ready to call Start().

This behavior caused a memory leak in the case Watch was called after
a controller has already been started and if the source.Kind's cache was
either stopped or not available any longer. The leak was caused by the
watches internal slice holding on to all references to each watch ever
issued (and their respective caches).

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <vincepri@vmware.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.6.x milestone Sep 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 15, 2020
@vincepri vincepri changed the title 🐛 Controller.Watch() should not store watches if already started [0.6] 🐛 Controller.Watch() should not store watches if already started Sep 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 15, 2020
@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ac380d6 into kubernetes-sigs:release-0.6 Sep 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants