-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added labelFilter for source CRD #1461
Added labelFilter for source CRD #1461
Conversation
/assign @linki |
2b38941
to
64665c7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for you PR, added some nits. PTAL.
And maybe it makes sense to mention it is only used by using a CRD as source? |
Added comment that currently only source CRD is supported in the Flag help |
78b9a49
to
19bbf89
Compare
@njuettner it seems like Travis CI build is failing because of OVH provider pushed yesterday to master. I already tried to rebase but it doesn't find the definition for |
yes @JoaoBraveCoding can you do a rebase please? this should be fixed now |
19bbf89
to
5c98e9f
Compare
@njuettner Should be ready for merging :) |
d63c08f
to
69d3299
Compare
69d3299
to
e1a4641
Compare
@njuettner @linki @Raffo @hjacobs could we get this merged? It has already been reviewed and fixed. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale @JoaoBraveCoding can you rebase this PR one more time and fix the conflict in file |
/assign |
03f9ea7
to
8867cd0
Compare
8867cd0
to
ecfdc45
Compare
/unassign @seanmalloy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like there was one requested change from @njuettner that may have been missed and has been marked resolved (ref comment in source/crd.go
), but other than that this looks good to me.
If you could either make that change, or add a comment noting why you do not believe it's necessary, I can throw my LGTM label on the PR and will work with the official maintainers to get this reviewed and hopefully merged soon! Thanks for the PR!
ecfdc45
to
1304ef3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing that formatting. I did notice one last little detail to tweak around formatting, sorry I missed it on the last review. I gave the PR one last review and the rest looks good to me.
Co-authored-by: Vinny Sabatini <vincent.sabatini@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for cleaning that up, I will try to work with the official maintainers to get this reviewed and hopefully merged.
/lgtm
/assign @Raffo @njuettner
/approve |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoaoBraveCoding, Raffo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Fixes #1450
Added labelFilter flag for source CRD and added tests to test new behaviour.
Signed-off-by: João Marçal joao.marcal12@gmail.com