Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 fix unit tests to work with later versions of ginkgo/gomega #2039

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2021

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

I was re-using some of the internal packages in pkg/plugins/internal in a project that requires more recent versions of Ginkgo and Gomega and I noticed that the tests fail due to duplicate calls to RunSpecs.

We should call RunSpecs only once in each package. See onsi/ginkgo#704 (comment) for what led me to this conclusion.

Also going ahead an bumping our deps to trigger this feedback in the future.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 25, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@Adirio Adirio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have to blame myself about this one.

Same happened in operator SDK (relevant commits: operator-framework/operator-sdk@f1f5926 and operator-framework/operator-sdk@5a5c4fc).

Also, as we are planning on exporting this packages (#2036), this fix is pretty well timed. I was actually planning on doing this myself.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Adirio, joelanford

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ed6539a into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 25, 2021
@joelanford joelanford deleted the fix/test-unit branch August 6, 2021 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants