-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Netlify access audit, cleanup, and next steps. #7311
Comments
/sig contribex |
@divya-mohan0209: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/sig contributor-experience |
@cblecker : I don't know if tagging you here would be appropriate. Apologies, if not. This is about the Netlify Access Amendment PR you had commented on earlier and specifically, this issue relates to non-docs accounts. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
Describe the issue
Per this issue and wider discussions in the Release retrospective + SIG Docs meetings, we have realised that an audit & cleanup of privileged accesses to Netlify is long overdue.
We've initiated a cleanup of Docs emeritus leadership and the efforts are being tracked here.
Since SIG Contribex handles the granting and revoking of access for other areas of the project, this issue has been created for the following purposes in the order mentioned below.
cc: @reylejano @natalisucks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: