-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support rolling back Deployments to previous revisions #2889
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
This issue still seems pretty relevant -- unstaling. /remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/lifecycle frozen |
Ref: #4542 |
Is the rolling back function currently supported on the dashboard page? |
No, it's not supported yet. |
This is a function that kubectl implements by adding its own annotations, and it is necessary to maintain data structures that are not directly supported by the K8s API. In Dashboard, we are considering how to handle data that extends the K8s API, and the implementation has stopped. |
Environment
Steps to reproduce
Try to roll back a Deployment to a previous revision (i.e., what
kubectl rollout undo
does).Observed result
No such UI interaction is available.
Expected result
A UI element is available that allows me to select from a list of recent revisions and roll back to any of them.
Motivation
Rolling back to a previous release is a fairly important operation as it allows to remedy critical situations quickly. While the functionality is accessible in
kubectl
as well, I find an integration into the Dashboard very desirable given that it's easier to use, especially for users that are not that familiar withkubectl
.Comments
I asked for the availability of this feature some time ago on Slack and got the response that it's worthwhile creating an issue. So I'm doing this now. :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: