Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix a bug where ingress GC will remove wanted LB if the namespace+nam… #688

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2019

Conversation

freehan
Copy link
Contributor

@freehan freehan commented Mar 14, 2019

fix a bug where ingress GC will remove wanted LB if the namespace+name length is between 44-47 chars Introduced by this commit: c74db67#diff-b1f4c09e8d55ceb3fe65799b21e57d43

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 14, 2019
pkg/loadbalancers/l7s_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
expectLBs []string
}{
{
"empty",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the labeled struct format, I find this hard to follow

  desc: "...",
  keys: []string{...}

pkg/loadbalancers/l7s_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
desc string
keys []string
existingLBs []string
expectLBs []string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extraExpectedLBs (any in ingressLBs must appear here, don't need to specify them separately.

testCases := []struct {
desc string
keys []string
existingLBs []string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gcpLBs

cloud := l7sPool.cloud
testCases := []struct {
desc string
keys []string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ingressLBs

}

for _, tc := range testCases {
for _, key := range tc.existingLBs {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tc := tc
t.Run(tc.desc, func(t*testing.T){
 ...
})

pkg/loadbalancers/l7s_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@freehan
Copy link
Contributor Author

freehan commented Mar 14, 2019

Ready for another round

@freehan
Copy link
Contributor Author

freehan commented Mar 15, 2019

Pushed

@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented Mar 15, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 15, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bowei, freehan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a528378 into kubernetes:master Mar 15, 2019
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants