Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a flag for Non-GCP mode NEG controller. #920

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2019

Conversation

cxhiano
Copy link
Contributor

@cxhiano cxhiano commented Oct 29, 2019

With '--enable-non-gcp-mode', NEG controller will create NEGs of type NON_GCP_PRIVATE_IP_PORT instead of GCE_VM_IP_PORT.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @cxhiano. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 29, 2019
pkg/neg/manager.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/neg/syncers/transaction.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/neg/syncers/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cxhiano cxhiano force-pushed the neg_controller_non_gcp_mode branch 2 times, most recently from 371e53f to 36b9548 Compare October 29, 2019 21:39
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 29, 2019
@cxhiano cxhiano changed the title [WIP] Add a flag for Non-GCP mode NEG controller. Add a flag for Non-GCP mode NEG controller. Oct 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 29, 2019
@freehan
Copy link
Contributor

freehan commented Oct 29, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 29, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@freehan freehan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall

@@ -113,7 +112,7 @@ func getService(serviceLister cache.Indexer, namespace, name string) *apiv1.Serv
}

// ensureNetworkEndpointGroup ensures corresponding NEG is configured correctly in the specified zone.
func ensureNetworkEndpointGroup(svcNamespace, svcName, negName, zone, negServicePortName string, cloud negtypes.NetworkEndpointGroupCloud, serviceLister cache.Indexer, recorder record.EventRecorder) error {
func ensureNetworkEndpointGroup(svcNamespace, svcName, negName, zone, negServicePortName string, networkEndpointType negtypes.NetworkEndpointType, cloud negtypes.NetworkEndpointGroupCloud, serviceLister cache.Indexer, recorder record.EventRecorder) error {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider 2 things:

  1. refactor the code to structure like this:
    A. construct expected NEG resource
    B. Check if the existing NEG is the same as expected
    C. Delete/Create/No-Op

  2. Or add a TODO on top and leave it later.

@freehan
Copy link
Contributor

freehan commented Oct 29, 2019

/lgtm
/assign freehan

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cxhiano, freehan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 212e82a into kubernetes:master Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants