Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare OpenStack security groups deterministically #11741

Merged

Conversation

ederst
Copy link
Contributor

@ederst ederst commented Jun 11, 2021

This fixes #11740 by sorting the security groups of the port model and when querying the cloud, which will result in tasks comparing those slices deterministically.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 11, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/openstack Issues or PRs related to openstack provider label Jun 11, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ederst!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kops 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kops has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ederst. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 11, 2021
This sorts the security groups of the port model and when querying the
cloud, which will result in tasks comparing those slices
deterministically.
@ederst ederst force-pushed the os-fix-security-group-sorting branch from 0a31540 to 233145f Compare June 11, 2021 13:04
@johngmyers
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 11, 2021
@johngmyers
Copy link
Member

/cc @olemarkus

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: olemarkus

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6c4dec4 into kubernetes:master Jun 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.22 milestone Jun 13, 2021
ederst added a commit to ederst/kops that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2021
…ernetes#11743-fork-release-1.20-bearingpoint

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#11741 kubernetes#11743 fork release 1.20 bearingpoint
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2021
…11743-origin-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of #11741: Compare OpenStack security groups deterministically
#11743: Make forwardToKubeDNS work in the NodeLocal DNSCache template
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/openstack Issues or PRs related to openstack provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Compare OpenStack security groups deterministically
4 participants