Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to k8s 1.11 libraries, fix code #5823

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 29, 2018

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 22, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 22, 2018
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

Blocked on #5817

@rdrgmnzs
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 23, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 23, 2018
@rdrgmnzs
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like kubernetes/client-go 1.11.3 uses strings.Builder which was only added in Golang 1.10. Should we drop Golang 1.9 from the travis tests? It looks like we'll also be adding Golang 1.11 once #5786 and #5781 lands.

@rdrgmnzs
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like kubernetes/client-go 1.11.3 uses strings.Builder which was only added in Golang 1.10. Should we drop Golang 1.9 from the travis tests? It looks like we'll also be adding Golang 1.11 once #5786 and #5781 lands.

And as I push comment, he pushes a diff to do just that. 😄

@@ -17,15 +17,14 @@ limitations under the License.
package api

import (
v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
)

type Addons struct {
metav1.TypeMeta `json:",inline"`

// We use v1.ObjectMeta so we don't serialize everything, even though we are using the full api machinery here (yet!)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment needs to be updated.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rdrgmnzs Ahh yeah good eye, if @justinsb doesn't have time to fix that when he fixes the conflict below, would you mind fixing in a follow up?

Copy link
Contributor

@mikesplain mikesplain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh wow, didn't realize we hadn't done this yet. Thanks so much @justinsb! We should get this testing in the wild so I'm going to approve this now.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 24, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 29, 2018
@rdrgmnzs
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 29, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb, mikesplain, rdrgmnzs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [justinsb,mikesplain]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3c22c2c into kubernetes:master Sep 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants