Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normalize etcd cluster provider names #6410

Merged

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

Instead of just casting a string, we validate and normalize.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 28, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 28, 2019
@@ -125,3 +129,15 @@ func SetClusterFields(fields []string, cluster *api.Cluster, instanceGroups []*a
}
return nil
}

func toEtcdProviderType(in string) api.EtcdProviderType {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

didn't you miss the second return type for error here? 😕

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I sure did - thanks for spotting! Too many branches!

Instead of just casting a string, we validate and normalize.
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the normalize_etcdclusterprovider_names branch from dd54dc4 to 83ea1c4 Compare January 30, 2019 04:28
@mikesplain
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good! Thanks @justinsb!

/retest
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 30, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb, mikesplain

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [justinsb,mikesplain]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zetaab
Copy link
Member

zetaab commented Feb 16, 2019

/test pull-kops-e2e-kubernetes-aws

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9090e8c into kubernetes:master Feb 16, 2019
justinsb added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cherry-pick cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants