dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider - fix static check

[hakman]

Ref: #7800

Errors from staticcheck:

dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/route53_test.go:131:6: func getInvalidRrs is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/coredns/coredns_test.go:111:6: func listRrsOrFail is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/clouddns_test.go:109:6: func getInvalidRrs is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/clouddns.go:28:18: field impl is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/clouddns.go:30:26: field impl is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/clouddns.go:34:16: field impl is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/stubs/clouddns.go:29:26: field impl is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/stubs/clouddns.go:30:26: field impl is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/stubs/clouddns.go:31:26: field impl is unused (U1000)
dnsprovider/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/stubs/clouddns.go:32:26: field impl is unused (U1000)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @hakman. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[hakman]

/cc @tanjunchen

[tanjunchen]

/ok-to-test

[hakman]

/assign @geojaz

[geojaz]

this looks great to me, but i'm not sure that i have all the context... afaict, this essentially looks like a removal of dead code. @justinsb : any concerns here?

[geojaz]

/lgtm

[geojaz]

/lgtm

[tanjunchen]

/lgtm

[rifelpet]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman, rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [rifelpet]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment