feat(openstack): propagate cloud labels to machines

[mitch000001]

Fixes #9086

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @mitch000001. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[hakman]

/ok-to-test

[zetaab]

@mitch000001 did you test this by deploying new cluster? I am just worried that we do not see problems again

[mitch000001]

@zetaab I successfully created a cluster with these changes in our Openstack environment. All tags were propagated successfully. And the cluster is valid.

[hakman]

@zetaab @olemarkus I think this got stuck somehow, as I see it was already approved.
/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman, mitch000001

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/model/openstackmodel/OWNERS [hakman]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mitch000001]

Although there are no conflicts with master, should I rebase/merge it in once more?

[hakman]

Should be ok without rebasing. If you don't mind, maybe give a try to the master branch once it's merged.
I plan to cut a new 1.19 alpha build during the weekend or early next week.

[hakman]

@mitch000001 I think you were right. It needs rebase because of the change to Go 1.15.

[mitch000001]

👍

[hakman]

/lgtm