Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: OpenStack: possibility to detach instances from the load #9865

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zetaab
Copy link
Member

@zetaab zetaab commented Sep 3, 2020

original PR #8874

This is under construction. The idea here is to make detachInstance working also with OpenStack. It will speed up rolling updates.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zetaab

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 3, 2020
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("error fetching instance list: %v", err)
}

instances := []servers.Server{}
for _, server := range allInstances {
val, ok := server.Metadata["k8s"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gophercloud also supports tags in ListOpts: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud@v0.13.0/openstack/compute/v2/servers#ListOpts Can we use that at line 137 to already limit the instances?

@mitch000001
Copy link
Contributor

@zetaab I was wondering if we could extract the bits in here related to instance naming, as this is already valuable on its own. Also, it shrinks the actual PR.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 14, 2020

@zetaab: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-kops-bazel-test 279a658 link /test pull-kops-bazel-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@zetaab
Copy link
Member Author

zetaab commented Jan 12, 2021

closed, see #10557

@zetaab zetaab closed this Jan 12, 2021
@zetaab zetaab deleted the feature/detachinst branch January 12, 2021 06:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/openstack Issues or PRs related to openstack provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants