Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: make CommentTags internal #452

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

alexzielenski
Copy link
Contributor

@alexzielenski alexzielenski commented Feb 16, 2024

I think it more straightforward to convert the commentTags into a spec.Schema and generate from that. Especially as we begin to add more "virtual" markers to the struct rather than direct spec.SchemaProps. Generating from an intermediate spec.SchemaProps will make things more direct and maintainable in the long run

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 16, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexzielenski

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 16, 2024
@alexzielenski alexzielenski force-pushed the refactor-commenttags branch 3 times, most recently from e23d119 to 43f51dc Compare February 16, 2024 23:30
pkg/generators/markers.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
I think it more straightforward to convert the commentTags into a spec.Schema and generate from that. Especially as we begin to add more "virtual" markers to the struct rather than direct spec.SchemaProps
@Jefftree
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 30be70b into kubernetes:master Feb 21, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants