remove seccomp profile path on security context

[charles-chenzz]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

remove the deprecated seccomp profile path

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #117045

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

[k8s-ci-robot]

Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the release-1.27 branch. This means every merged PR will be automatically fast-forwarded via the periodic ci-fast-forward job to the release branch of the upcoming v1.27.0 release.

Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Sat Apr 1 04:33:26 UTC 2023.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @charles-chenzz. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[charles-chenzz]

/sig node

[saschagrunert]

/ok-to-test

[bart0sh]

/priority important-longterm
/triage accepted
/lgtm
/assign @mrunalp @derekwaynecarr @dchen1107

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 82fea621c09da8a732103ef7045f725224e787ac

[bart0sh]

@charles-chenzz Can you look at #117084 ? It seems it goes further than this PR and removes also unused code.

[charles-chenzz]

@charles-chenzz Can you look at #117084 ? It seems it goes further than this PR and removes also unused code.

@bart0sh I would prefer stay at this moment, cus the issues only ask for remove the code todo and didn't request more, so I am not very sure that we need to remove the other unused code. And I would prefer we don't remove that more on #117084 , it's -310 lines of code. if we really need to move other unused code, I would update and squash commit

[charles-chenzz]

/assign @SergeyKanzhelev
ready for approve now

[bart0sh]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: b9fa44ee87388166e85777fdbc463ca98d3f65d0

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: charles-chenzz, mrunalp, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/kubelet/OWNERS [mrunalp]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment