-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate docker v1.12 #28698
Comments
@vishh Yeah, we already have a daily running docker validation test running e2e test against newest docker release with kubernetes head. And thanks to @wonderfly |
With #28213, we'll have another docker validation test against node e2e. PTAL~ :) |
@Random-Liu I'm assigning this issue to you. You can close it whenever you think that we have enabled adequate testing. |
FYI, The docker validation test starts failing from Jul 9. |
Looks like an issue related to the container-vm-image-staging project. I'll take a look. |
@wonderfly Thanks a lot~ :) |
The image is back there but I think the test will still fail due to kubernetes/test-infra#266 (comment) |
The continuous e2e tests are back to green now. |
FYI, docker 1.12-rc4 came out yesterday. Our first run of validation test is red because some system pods in
|
This seems to be a image pulling flake. I started a gci-canary with docker 1.12-rc4 myself and pulled the image |
Or, you can log onto Jenkins and trigger a manual build, if you want the result sooner. |
@wonderfly Done! Don't know I have the permission to do that, Thanks a lot! |
FYI, we've got the first green node e2e build with:
|
@Random-Liu What about testing with old container VM? |
@vishh To test old container VM, we need to a good way to install newest docker release on the containerVM. Maybe download and unpack binary directly. |
The memory leakage problem issue in v1.11: moby/moby#24420 |
It seems not. The fix is just merged today |
Just FYI, till this morning all continuous docker validation node e2e tests are green.
In kernel log and docker log, no clue is found around that time:
Docker log:
|
@Random-Liu what's the link to the build? |
v1.11 results copied from this comment Introduction Benchmark Environment
1. Benchmark list/inspect with varying number of containersUsing 2. Benchmark list/inspect with varying operation intervalsUsing
3. Benchmark list/inspect with varying number of goroutinesUsing
Conclusion |
I see this was closed, does that mean v1.4 has been validated against docker v1.12? |
@dlorenc In v1.4 we introduced automated docker validation test. We use node e2e to validate newest docker with Kubernetes HEAD. Currently, no critical issues found at least with this test. |
@dlorenc Officially, k8s v1.4 still recommends using docker v1.11 and that On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Lantao Liu notifications@github.com wrote:
|
@vishh Thanks! Is there anywhere that's written down that I can follow along? |
@dlorenc, each kubernetes release, we document the validated & supported runtime (docker & rkt) along with the known issues. You can find those information in release notes. |
@dchen1107 It would be nice to put this somewhere more prominently. It's pretty hard to track down in changelog and it seems to be OS specific. I'm not sure everybody realizes how important validation is given docker's instability. |
Automatic merge from submit-queue Docker Micro Benchmark: Add dockerd and containerd support. @timstclair Can you help me review this? I remember you made similar change locally before. I used this to get the result kubernetes/kubernetes#28698 (comment), but forgot to submit the PR at that time.
Known issue in 1.11.2 that needs further validation in 1.12
Know issues about 1.12
|
So where does it stand now? Do we have Docker 1.12 working in Minikube? |
Multiple RCs have been released for docker v1.12 already. We should start testing docker v1.12 soon. @Random-Liu is our automated testing suite active? Are we already validating docker v1.12?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: