Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

have a saner default value of --terminated-pod-gc-threshold #78693

Closed
nikopen opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 26 comments
Closed

have a saner default value of --terminated-pod-gc-threshold #78693

nikopen opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 26 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps.

Comments

@nikopen
Copy link
Contributor

nikopen commented Jun 4, 2019

controller-manager 's config flag --terminated-pod-gc-threshold currently has a default value of 12500 - that's quite a lot!

/sig apps
/kind bug

@nikopen nikopen added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jun 4, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. label Jun 4, 2019
@ellieayla
Copy link

Reference

// RecommendedDefaultPodGCControllerConfiguration defaults a pointer to a
// PodGCControllerConfiguration struct. This will set the recommended default
// values, but they may be subject to change between API versions. This function
// is intentionally not registered in the scheme as a "normal" `SetDefaults_Foo`
// function to allow consumers of this type to set whatever defaults for their
// embedded configs. Forcing consumers to use these defaults would be problematic
// as defaulting in the scheme is done as part of the conversion, and there would
// be no easy way to opt-out. Instead, if you want to use this defaulting method
// run it in your wrapper struct of this type in its `SetDefaults_` method.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 12, 2019
@hpandeycodeit
Copy link

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 17, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 16, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 15, 2020
@hpandeycodeit
Copy link

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jan 30, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 29, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 29, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@blind3dd
Copy link

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@blind3dd: You can't reopen an issue/PR unless you authored it or you are a collaborator.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@qiutongs
Copy link
Contributor

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Jan 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@qiutongs: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@nikopen: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Jan 14, 2021
@qiutongs
Copy link
Contributor

Revive this issue and see if we can come up with a more reasonable default value for the threshold.

@qiutongs
Copy link
Contributor

Job controller currently relies on Pods not being removed to keep track of completions. #28486

Therefore it seems we'd better keep the current threshold before fixing that issue.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

/reopen
as this is still relevant in the future.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Mar 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@alculquicondor: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen
as this is still relevant in the future.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dlouzan
Copy link

dlouzan commented Aug 18, 2022

@qiutongs Since #98238 implemented better job tracking in 1.22, should this be reopened and a saner default be applied? 12500 still feels like quite a lot.

/cc @nikopen

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

alculquicondor commented Aug 18, 2022

I'm no longer sure that changing the default is a good idea. Users might be relying on this. For example, I'm aware that Argo requires the pod to also stay in the API to do its accounting.

If you are sure that your cluster doesn't have these problems, why not change the value on your end?

@dlouzan
Copy link

dlouzan commented Aug 18, 2022

@alculquicondor Hey, thanks for the answer. Not an issue on our end, we can ofc modify the defaults. It's even mentioned on the CIS hardening for k3s, as this might be a too-high value for certain environments.

But since I don't know all implications of that change, and the docs do not explain it in detail, this feedback is actually kind-of what I was looking for 😀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

9 participants