-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skip publishing OpenAPI for nonstructural schemas #82653
Skip publishing OpenAPI for nonstructural schemas #82653
Conversation
/milestone v1.16 |
/retest |
verified only
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've test it out kube-apiserver rc.1 with this patch and it works again. Thanks @liggitt ! 🚤
cd6eb38
to
9cf1516
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
9cf1516
to
0d832d7
Compare
/retest |
/lgtm |
grrr
|
0d832d7
to
0f64ec9
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
bazel regenerated, retagged |
…3-upstream-release-1.16 Automated cherry pick of #82653: Skip publishing OpenAPI for nonstructural schemas
LGTM |
/area custom-resources |
@liggitt not sure if you mind the question here vs. another forum. Could this patch be related to a recent regression in the OpenFaaS CRD when taking K8s 1.17.5 and 1.18? openfaas/faas-netes#630 (comment) |
no, this is not related. what you are seeing might be related to #85127 (comment) |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
spec.preserveUnknownFields=true
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #82651
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
/assign @roycaihw @sttts
/cc @aanm
/sig api-machinery