New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix discovering numa distance when node ids are not starting from 0 or it's ids are not sequential #113788
Fix discovering numa distance when node ids are not starting from 0 or it's ids are not sequential #113788
Conversation
Hi @PiotrProkop. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/ok-to-test |
/triage accepted |
/approve |
/milestone v1.26 |
/cc dchen1107 derekwaynecarr It will cause the |
Just to clarify it will fail if NUMA nodes ids are not sequential e.g |
I'll defer to node reviewers on this specific change, but I labeled the bug as a regression/release-blocker and added it to the milestone |
Thanks @liggitt is that label / milestone not applicable to this PR itself? Or just the bug? |
if this is accepted as the fix, it will be added to this PR (that's what I'm deferring to node folks on) |
bug in alpha feature that did not get caught in our CI jobs. we need this in 1.26 itself! /milestone v1.26 |
thanks @PiotrProkop |
Great, thanks. Yes. I have already approved it as a sig-node-approver: |
well, we didn't enable any alpha feature gates.. this was just happening in our regular CI test on ppc64le platform with single NUMA node(with id 1) |
/hold |
5d7530c
to
5a4dd67
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: klueska, PiotrProkop The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…r their ids are not sequential Signed-off-by: PiotrProkop <pprokop@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: PiotrProkop <pprokop@nvidia.com>
5a4dd67
to
540b5bd
Compare
@PiotrProkop Thanks for the update. Now that the /lgtm |
Thanks, for the review. |
/retest
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #113781
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: