New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrated pkg/scheduler/framework/plugins/volumebinding
to contextual logging
#116803
Migrated pkg/scheduler/framework/plugins/volumebinding
to contextual logging
#116803
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/test all |
Depending on the framework package which needs to wait for framework packages to merge first. Or use Temporarily close this PR. |
e568700
to
07488c0
Compare
/test all |
/test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel |
/sig instrumentation |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
07488c0
to
3eb6c4d
Compare
/remove-lifecycle stale |
/triage accepted |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: fe4e37b20f7f8fabe5e9036afa336896220dfb3d
|
/assign @xing-yang For approval. |
/approve |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mengjiao-liu, pohly, xing-yang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Migrated
pkg/scheduler/framework/plugins/volumebinding
to contextual loggingWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #91633 (comment)
Special notes for your reviewer:
There are some dependencies on packagepkg/scheduler/framework
, the PR is added first to make the test pass, and then the PR is rebase after the framework package code is merged.Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: