New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
removed the deprecated azureFile
in-tree storage plugin
#118236
Conversation
/priority important-soon |
My suggestion for the changelog: removed the deprecated `azureFile` in-tree storage plugin Do we want to mention CSI drivers here? |
/assign @xing-yang @msau42 /meow |
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, dims The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
azureFile
in-tree storage plugin
/assign @jsafrane |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 3e742cd8fd8befc49b7bc33bcc9572eccdff9c24
|
I'll revert this PR tomorrow. @andyzhangx, we need to wait for one more release. |
/meow sad |
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/meow sad |
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
this is the reverted PR: #118388 |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
removed the deprecated
azureFile
in-tree storage pluginWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: