-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Enhance boolean assertions when fail #121888
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/sig testing |
/reopen |
@pohly: Reopened this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
@SD-13: still interested in finishing this? I need to check again, but it seemed complete as far as I remember. Currently it needs a rebase. |
@pohly yes, I want to finish it. AFAIR, failing tests need small fixes and rebase. I will look into it this weekend. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/remove-sig cluster-lifecycle
/remove-area kubeadm
Signed-off-by: Sujay <89520981+SD-13@users.noreply.github.com>
40b5dd9
to
e2db3fc
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: SD-13 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/remove-sig cluster-lifecycle |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-master |
Adding label Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@SD-13: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR introduces the use of
gomega.Be[True/False]Because
instead ofgomega.BeTrue/False
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Related-to: #105678
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: