-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
e2e_node: fix DevicePlugin feature flags #123160
e2e_node: fix DevicePlugin feature flags #123160
Conversation
423139f
to
132142e
Compare
@swatisehgal It could be that I misunderstood which DevicePlugin e2e tests should be running by which jobs. Can you point me out to the jobs(s) running generic device plugins and device manager tests? It looks like |
132142e
to
ca3b79d
Compare
@SergeyKanzhelev To your question about real GPU jobs. There is at least one: https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-blocking#gce-device-plugin-gpu-master and it seems to run one GPU test: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/scheduling/nvidia-gpus.go#L327. Additionally it runs windows test case for DevicePlugin, but this should be fixed by this PR. |
/test |
@kannon92: The
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 0384d717aed763413a2363ffce72eeb7ecfc0bec
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm
59d9882
to
cbecdcb
Compare
@kannon92 @SergeyKanzhelev @klueska rebased, PTAL |
Feature:DevicePluginProbe and NodeFeature:DevicePluginProbe are not used by any of the test-infra jobs. This commit renames NodeFeature:DevicePluginProbe to NodeFeature:DevicePlugin and removes Feature:DevicePlugin and Feature:DeviceManager to avoid having both Feature and NodeFeature tags for the same feature. NOTE: Test-infra SIG-Node jobs should focus on the NodeFeature:DevicePlugin to run generic Device Plugins tests.
cbecdcb
to
ba7a74a
Compare
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: d3001cf17eab24cd9a25f39841f74cc0cac8f3de
|
@SergeyKanzhelev @dims @mrunalp can you review and approve? |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bart0sh, dims, SergeyKanzhelev The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@bart0sh: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass. This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:
You can:
/retest |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Feature:DevicePluginProbe and NodeFeature:DevicePluginProbe are not used by any of the test-infra jobs.
This commit renames NodeFeature:DevicePluginProbe to NodeFeature:DevicePlugin and removes Feature:DevicePlugin and Feature:DeviceManager to avoid having both Feature and NodeFeature tags for the same feature.
NOTE: Test-infra SIG-Node jobs should focus on the NodeFeature:DevicePlugin to run generic Device Plugins tests.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?