Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

version bump for gci to milestone 53 #27210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2016
Merged

version bump for gci to milestone 53 #27210

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2016

Conversation

adityakali
Copy link
Contributor

@adityakali adityakali commented Jun 10, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Fixes #26455

GCI release 53 includes kubernetes v1.3.0-alpha.5 with docker-1.11.2.

@dchen1107 @kubernetes/goog-image @andyzheng0831

@adityakali
version bump for gci to milestone 53
4dde9a6 
Fixes kubernetes#26455

GCI release 53 includes kubernetes v1.3.0-alpha.5 with docker-1.11.2.
@dchen1107 dchen1107 self-assigned this Jun 10, 2016
@dchen1107 dchen1107 added area/os/gci sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Jun 10, 2016
@dchen1107 dchen1107 added this to the v1.3 milestone Jun 10, 2016
@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@dchen1107 dchen1107 added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 10, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 10, 2016
@adityakali
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dchen1107 the failure seems unrelated to this issue.
Also, can you please add p0 label to this to match the priority of the bug #26455 ?
Thanks!

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@adityakali
You must link to the test flake issue which caused you to request this manual re-test.
Re-test requests should be in the form of: k8s-bot test this issue: #<number>
Here is the list of open test flakes.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2016
@adityakali
Copy link
Contributor Author

@k8s-bot test this issue #IGNORE

@adityakali
Copy link
Contributor Author

@k8s-bot test this issue: #25539

@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

LGTM again

@dchen1107 dchen1107 added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. labels Jun 13, 2016
@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

Above integration failure is due to a transient git failure, and I didn't find any other pr build failed with the same issue, so I didn't file a separate issue for this one. The failure has nothing to do with the pr.

Checking out Revision 50c4b140d1e2177cbfc52318974b0122beade108 (origin/pr/26900/merge)
 > /usr/bin/git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10
 > /usr/bin/git checkout -f 50c4b140d1e2177cbfc52318974b0122beade108 # timeout=20
FATAL: Could not checkout 50c4b140d1e2177cbfc52318974b0122beade108
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not checkout 50c4b140d1e2177cbfc52318974b0122beade108
    at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$9.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1992)
    at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152)
    at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
    at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:120)
    at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)
    at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:332)
    at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
    at ......remote call to agent-pr-4(Native Method)
    at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1416)
    at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:220)
    at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:781)
    at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor243.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
    at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:131)
        ...

@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

@k8s-bot test this issue #IGNORE

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 13, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 4dde9a6.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 45bb682 into kubernetes:master Jun 13, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@dchen1107 dchen1107

Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@adityakali @dchen1107 @k8s-github-robot @k8s-bot @googlebot