Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubernetes pod and namespace security model #4029

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2015

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

This proposed update to docs/design/security.md includes proposals
on how to ensure containers have consistent Linux security behavior
across nodes, how containers authenticate and authorize to the master
and other components, and how secret data could be distributed to
pods to allow that authentication.

References concepts from #3910, #2030, and #2297 as well as upstream issues
around the Docker vault and Docker secrets.

Pulled together to frame the discussion from #3910 as a cross Kubernetes
concept as per @erictune

@a-robinson a-robinson assigned a-robinson and erictune and unassigned a-robinson Feb 2, 2015
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also references #4126

@smarterclayton smarterclayton mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2015
@erictune
Copy link
Member

erictune commented Feb 5, 2015

Will look at monday when I return to work.
On Feb 4, 2015 1:05 PM, "Clayton Coleman" notifications@github.com wrote:

Also references #4126
#4126


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4029 (comment)
.

@smarterclayton smarterclayton added the kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. label Feb 9, 2015
* are less focused about application security

* Administrators:
* are less focused on application security. Focused on operation system security.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/operation/operating

@erictune
Copy link
Member

minor typos, and we will need to come back to a discussion of how practical 4b and 4c are. But LGTM.

This proposed update to docs/design/security.md includes proposals
on how to ensure containers have consistent Linux security behavior
across nodes, how containers authenticate and authorize to the master
and other components, and how secret data could be distributed to
pods to allow that authentication.

References concepts from kubernetes#3910, kubernetes#2030, and kubernetes#2297 as well as upstream issues
around the Docker vault and Docker secrets.
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comments and questions updated.

----- Original Message -----

minor typos, and we will need to come back to a discussion of how practical
4b and 4c are. But LGTM.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#4029 (comment)

erictune added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2015
Kubernetes pod and namespace security model
@erictune erictune merged commit e84b5b9 into kubernetes:master Feb 13, 2015
@benmccann
Copy link

You might be interested in this recent security design for etcd. Would be interesting to get your feedback there: etcd-io/etcd#2384

xingzhou pushed a commit to xingzhou/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2016
Kubernetes pod and namespace security model
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/security kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants