Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add empty file to trigger PR testing #46662

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

ixdy
Copy link
Member

@ixdy ixdy commented May 31, 2017

/assign
@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@ixdy ixdy added the do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. label May 31, 2017
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 31, 2017
@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented May 31, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-label-needed labels May 31, 2017
@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented May 31, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

3 similar comments
@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented May 31, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented May 31, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented May 31, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented May 31, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

2 similar comments
@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@Q-Lee
Copy link
Contributor

Q-Lee commented Jun 1, 2017

You'll probably need #46259

@fejta
Copy link
Contributor

fejta commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-federation-e2e-gce test this
ref kubernetes/test-infra#2931

@fejta
Copy link
Contributor

fejta commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws test this
ref kubernetes/test-infra#2932

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-federation-e2e-gce test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-gce test this

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

1 similar comment
@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Jun 2, 2017

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel test this

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 2, 2017
@shashidharatd
Copy link

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-federation-e2e-gce test this
ref: #46827

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 5, 2017
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-e2-kind

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

sigh
it was still using the wrong config, and the last comment is missing an e.
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind

@aojea
Copy link
Member

aojea commented Feb 20, 2020

/retest

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

BenTheElder commented Mar 1, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only
[didn't take..?]
edit: see https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/46662/pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only/1234255378171039744

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Mar 2, 2020

Hmm… unspecified failure exactly at one hour… timeout?

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

BenTheElder commented Mar 2, 2020

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Mar 2, 2020

Took forever, but passed. We've now officially bounded the exceptions to the "Conformance only requires GA things" to a single API and a single feature flag, both of which we plan to GA in 1.19.

@ixdy
Copy link
Member Author

ixdy commented Mar 2, 2020

/honk

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ixdy:
goose image

In response to this:

/honk

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-canary

1 similar comment
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-canary

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-canary
old config??

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

success :-) https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/46662/pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-canary/1251005530344787968

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/retest

@amwat
Copy link
Contributor

amwat commented Aug 11, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-kubetest2

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ixdy: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-dind-build c7c94de link /test pull-kubernetes-dind-build
pull-kubernetes-federation-e2e-gce-canary 814df85 link /test pull-kubernetes-federation-e2e-gce-canary
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-gce-canary d900324c626f542a45e26aedd96d3b6c7163e53c link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-gce-canary
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gke e88187e1f921b0cc21de13ca924a881743b07b59 link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gke
pull-kubernetes-verify-podutil e88187e1f921b0cc21de13ca924a881743b07b59 link /test pull-kubernetes-verify-podutil
pull-kubernetes-bazel-test-integration-canary e88187e1f921b0cc21de13ca924a881743b07b59 link /test pull-kubernetes-bazel-test-integration-canary
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws e88187e1f921b0cc21de13ca924a881743b07b59 link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-rbe e88187e1f921b0cc21de13ca924a881743b07b59 link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-rbe
pull-kubernetes-integration-podutil 7d1211f link /test pull-kubernetes-integration-podutil
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce 7d1211f link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-kubetest2 7d1211f link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-kubetest2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Aug 13, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-integration

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Aug 13, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-integration
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-ubuntu-containerd

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 11, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 11, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

#92316

I still have 46662 memorized, leaving a breadcrumb 🙃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet