Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubelet should request protobuf from the apiserver #75602

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 22, 2019

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

The kubelet was not asking for application/vnd.kubernetes.protobuf
on list and get calls. It looks like we lost that code when we
moved to cert rotation. Clean up the client initialization path
and make sure that all non-dynamic clients use protobuf by default.

A future change will fix it so that dynamic clients can also safely
use protobuf via negotiation.

/kind bug

The Kubelet now properly requests protobuf objects where they are
supported from the apiserver, reducing load in large clusters.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 22, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/kubelet sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 22, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 22, 2019
The kubelet was not asking for application/vnd.kubernetes.protobuf
on list and get calls. It looks like we lost that code when we
moved to cert rotation. Clean up the client initialization path
and make sure that all non-dynamic clients use protobuf by default.
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kubernetes/sig-scalability-bugs

This regressed a very long time ago.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. label Mar 22, 2019
@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor

mtaufen commented Mar 22, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 22, 2019
@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor

mtaufen commented Mar 22, 2019

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3312da8 into kubernetes:master Mar 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubelet cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants