Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #76691: Fix Azure SLB support for multiple backend pools #76759

Conversation

feiskyer
Copy link
Member

Cherry pick of #76691 on release-1.11.

#76691: Fix Azure SLB support for multiple backend pools

Azure VM and vmssVM support multiple backend pools for the same SLB, but
not for different LBs.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 18, 2019
@feiskyer
Copy link
Member Author

/priority critical-urgent
/kind bug
/sig azure
/retest
/assign @andyzhangx

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. sig/azure cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 18, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: feiskyer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 18, 2019
@feiskyer
Copy link
Member Author

ping @andyzhangx

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2019
Copy link
Member

@andyzhangx andyzhangx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@feiskyer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @foxish

@foxish foxish added cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. labels Apr 23, 2019
@foxish foxish added this to the v1.11 milestone Apr 23, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f25d0f2 into kubernetes:release-1.11 Apr 23, 2019
@feiskyer feiskyer deleted the automated-cherry-pick-of-#76691-upstream-release-1.11 branch April 23, 2019 12:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants