Automated cherry pick of #78672: Enable resize in default gce storageclass

[msau42]

Cherry pick of #78672 on release-1.13.

#78672: Enable resize in default gce storageclass

[k8s-ci-robot]

@msau42: This PR is not for the master branch but does not have the cherry-pick-approved label. Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To approve the cherry-pick, please assign the patch release manager for the release branch by writing /assign @username in a comment when ready.

The list of patch release managers for each release can be found here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[msau42]

/kind bug
/priority important-soon
/assign @saad-ali @mikedanese

[saad-ali]

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msau42, saad-ali
To complete the pull request process, please assign mikedanese
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @mikedanese in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• cluster/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

@msau42: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-integration	7102bdc	link	/test pull-kubernetes-integration

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[hoegaarden]

Thanks for the PRs, @msau42!

I was wondering why this is labeled as a bug? The original issue #75004 is labeled as feature, and to me it also looks and reads more like a feature. Could you give us some context on why you think it is of such high importance that it needs to go into all currently supported releases?

/cc @kubernetes/patch-release-team @kubernetes/sig-storage-bugs

---

other PRs/CPs

• merged: master Enable resize in default gce storageclass #78672
• open: 1.15 Automated cherry pick of #78672: Enable resize in default gce storageclass #79053 ; 1.14 Automated cherry pick of #78672: Enable resize in default gce storageclass #79054

[msau42]

@hoegaarden this sort of falls in between a feature and a bug. It's a config change that we should have made when we moved the feature to beta to make it easier for users to consume.

[msau42]

That being said, it's not urgently breaking anyone and is more of a nice to have to improve the user experience.

[hoegaarden]

Consulting https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/release/versioning.md#patch-releases I don't think this qualifies as a change that should go into a patch release.

I will close this PR (and the ones on the other release branches).

Please, if you don't agree with that decision, ping me, the @kubernetes/patch-release-team, or re-open the PR(s)!

[hoegaarden]

/close

[k8s-ci-robot]

@hoegaarden: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.