Convert TaintBasedEvictions e2e to integration test

[damemi]

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespaces from that line:

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
Rebases and updates the changes from #80817 with the feedback provided in that PR

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

[damemi]

/cc @ravisantoshgudimetla @Huang-Wei @bsalamat @ahg-g

[soltysh]

/sig scheduling
/kind cleanup
/priority important-longterm
@damemi you're missing bazel update

[damemi]

/retest

[Huang-Wei]

Thanks, @damemi . Some comments below, and for reviewers' conveniences please make changes in a new commit, we can squash later.

[Huang-Wei]

/assign

[damemi]

@Huang-Wei with master reopened now, do you have a chance to look at this again? If it looks good I can squash down

[oomichi]

How about defining tolerationSeconds in each test struct like

		{
			name:                "Taint based evictions for NodeNotReady and 200 tolerationseconds",
			nodeTaints:          []v1.Taint{{Key: schedulerapi.TaintNodeNotReady, Effect: v1.TaintEffectNoExecute}},
			nodeConditions:      []v1.NodeCondition{{Type: v1.NodeReady, Status: v1.ConditionFalse}},
			pod:                 testPod,
			waitForPodCondition: "updated with tolerationSeconds of 200",
			tolerationSeconds:   200,

for the readability?

[damemi]

TolerationSeconds needs to be a pointer value https://github.com/kubernetes/api/blob/master/core/v1/types.go#L2814

So, we need to declare it in a variable somewhere (can't just do a pointer to an int literal) so we decided this was the way to do it (see #81856 (comment))

[oomichi]

/cc @oomichi

[damemi]

@Huang-Wei pushed your suggestions in a new commit. If this looks good let me know and I will squash

[oomichi]

Thanks for updating,

/approve

[oomichi]

nit: This return might be unnecessary.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, oomichi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• test/e2e/scheduling/OWNERS [oomichi]
• test/integration/scheduler/OWNERS [oomichi]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[damemi]

Since this has an /approve, I'm going to squash

[Huang-Wei]

/lgtm

Thanks @damemi for the efforts!

[damemi]

/retest