Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Fix shellcheck failure in log-dump/log-dump.sh" #85858

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2019

Conversation

jkaniuk
Copy link
Contributor

@jkaniuk jkaniuk commented Dec 3, 2019

This reverts commit e99a325.

Probable cause of DumpClusterLogs failures in tests #85753

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
Fix DumpClusterLogs failures in 5k clusters

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #85753

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


/sig cluster-lifecycle
/sig scalability

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 3, 2019
@jkaniuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkaniuk commented Dec 3, 2019

/cc wojtek-t

@jkaniuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkaniuk commented Dec 3, 2019

/cc BenTheElder dims k-toyoda-pi

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

#85753 (comment) seems to point to a specific change, do we need to revert all of the fixes?

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/approve
😞

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

wojtek-t commented Dec 3, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, jkaniuk, wojtek-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2019
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Dec 3, 2019

yes please!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 249c6cf into kubernetes:master Dec 3, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.18 milestone Dec 3, 2019
@k-toyoda-pi
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for reverting. I'm sorry the commit causes the problem... 😔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Failing Test] ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-{performance, correctness} fail due to hanging DumpClusterLogs
6 participants