Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #94489: Do not assume storageclass is still in-tree after csi #95722

Commits on Oct 20, 2020

  1. Do not assume storageclass is still in-tree after csi migration

    Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
    ialidzhikov committed Oct 20, 2020
    Copy the full SHA
    c23350e View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history