New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix gcbmgr cloudbuild clone step with https remote #1109
Conversation
Signed-off-by: hasheddan <georgedanielmangum@gmail.com>
@hasheddan: Adding label: Reasons for blocking this PR:[Changes to certain release tools can affect our ability to test, build, and release Kubernetes. This PR must be explicitly approved by SIG Release repo admins.] Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hasheddan --
However, I would be happy to also update gitlib::repo_state with the new vars and eliminate usage of the two aforementioned ones if that is more desirable :)
Let's do this. Being additive here is asking for misinterpretation/misuse.
/hold
Signed-off-by: hasheddan <georgedanielmangum@gmail.com>
This is looking good on GCB now. Compare current test run execution details:
with the previous failure:
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hasheddan, justaugustus The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: hasheddan georgedanielmangum@gmail.com
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes bug introduced by #1103 that causes
cloudbuild
clone step to fail cloning release repo.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Ref #1103
Slack Conversation: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CJH2GBF7Y/p1582034517113800
Special notes for your reviewer:
I have opted to be additive with the variables used here due to the fact that
RELEASE_TOOL_REPO
andRELEASE_TOOL_BRANCH
get passed toanago
for the samegitlib::repo_state
check. However, I would be happy to also updategitlib::repo_state
with the new vars and eliminate usage of the two aforementioned ones if that is more desirable :)Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
/cc @justaugustus @cpanato @saschagrunert