New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] makefile wrapping concept #621
Conversation
The order of operations in the release workflow is a mix of complicated, error-prone command invocations, and manual synchronization check points. A summary of these is needed to make the required actions more clear. Also adds a table of contents as intradoc links makes eaiser navigating to the appropriate info a different points in a process that spans days or even weeks. Signed-off-by: Tim Pepper <tpepper@vmware.com>
For a concrete discussion on tools improvement, I want to show what I'm imagining it might look like to establish a wrapping of the detailed commands which do build and publish. My goal is to allow parallel back end implementations and proof-of-concept comparisons. If the top level flow is abstracted and callable by automation, without those tools getting coupled to the internal implementation, we are in a more flexible and testable place and enable more to be done through automation.
/hold here for discussion |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tpepper The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@tpepper: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/milestone v1.16 |
/close |
@justaugustus: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The commit looks fugly, but basically is adding a third column to the table introduced in #620
For a concrete discussion on tools improvement, I want to show what I'm imagining it might look like to establish a wrapping of the detailed commands which do build and publish.
My goal is to allow parallel back end implementations and proof-of-concept comparisons. If the top level flow is abstracted and callable by automation, without those tools getting coupled to the internal implementation, we are in a more flexible and testable place and enable more to be done through automation.