Section regarding Portworx in-tree plugin deprecation should be removed from blog

[xing-yang]

This is a Bug Report

Problem:
In the blog https://kubernetes.io/blog/2022/04/07/upcoming-changes-in-kubernetes-1-24/, there is a paragraph about Portworx CSI driver migration. This was because Portworx was originally targeting Beta in 1.24 so the in-tree plugin will be deprecated as a result of that. However, Portworx CSI migration didn't make it, so it stayed in Alpha in 1.24. They will try to target Beta again in 1.25.

So the following paragraph should be removed from the 1.24 blog.

In-tree provisioner to CSI driver migration: This applies to a number of in-tree plugins, including [Portworx](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/2589). Refer to the [In-tree Storage Plugin to CSI Migration Design Doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/design-proposals-archive/blob/main/storage/csi-migration.md#background-and-motivations) for more information.

Proposed Solution:

Page to Update:
https://kubernetes.io/...

[k8s-ci-robot]

@xing-yang: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

SIG Docs takes a lead on issue triage for this website, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the triage/accepted label.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[sftim]

/area blog
/sig release

We should not remove that paragraph; however, we can follow it with a clarifying statement, and we can strike through text that is no longer correct.

[humblec]

@sftim I dont know its worth to mention, along with portworx , rbd was also in the same state, that said, both entered alpha in 1.23 and then tried beta in 1.24 , but both didnt make it.. I am not sure how only one landed in first place though.

[nitishfy]

/assign

[sftim]

/retitle Section regarding Portworx in-tree plugin deprecation should be removed from blog

[nitishfy]

@sftim what according to you should be added more?

[nitishfy]

Hi! @xing-yang , according to you what changes should be done to the file so that I can have a basic idea regarding the same if we both are inclining at same thought?