-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SIG Node Spotlight #46454
Add SIG Node Spotlight #46454
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
✅ Pull request preview available for checkingBuilt without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Hi @fsmunoz, thanks you for your contribution. |
I have already signed it yesterday. |
/retitle Add SIG Node Spotlight |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Formatting fix suggestions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Formatting fix suggestions (missed from #46454 (review))
/easycla |
Co-authored-by: Arpit Agrawal <72355275+Hii-Arpit@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Laura Santamaria <nimbinatus@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sandeep Kanabar <sandeepkanabar@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com>
Looks like this is missing a CLA for one of the listed coauthors. |
/check-cla |
/hold pending CLA issues being cleared on kubernetes/contributor-site#498 and for this PR Also, don't remove the hold if the listed publication date is in the past |
per kubernetes/contributor-site#498 We'll need to push the publication date back further. I suggest mid-June (let's say the 14th) and then we see if we can get a review on the two blog article PRs ahead of that date. |
@fsmunoz - did you mean to close this? |
@sftim no, side-effect of deleting my website fork to be able to fork the other one... I'll reopen this one after I'm done with that (or try to at least). I'll take care of the missing CLA afterward. |
/reopen |
@fsmunoz: Failed to re-open PR: state cannot be changed. The repository that submitted this pull request has been deleted. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
My attempt to recreate the same fork failed miserably, I will open a new PR for this to avoid losing more time. |
Add the SIG Node spotlight interview.
The
contributor-site
article has been reviewed: kubernetes/contributor-site#498 ; this is a copy of the lastest version, with minor changes due to the different formats.