Removing blog post per ContribEx and Docs

[chris-short]

SIG Docs co-chairs, SIG ContribEx co-chairs, and SIG ContribEx Comms Leads determined this blog post, to a large extent, includes AI-generated text by a large-scale language model (LLM). As is the policy for Kubernetes localization teams across the project, AI-generated text must include substantial human adaptations, changes, and review.

Co-chairs of SIG Docs, SIG ContribEx, and ContribEx Comms Suproject Leads have used the external tool CopyLeaks to verify the substantial presence of AI-generated text in this post. As a result, it will be removed from the Kubernetes blog and Contributor Site.

[netlify]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	2c13932
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/664e0aa1d6ad20000827a2a3
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-46494--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[sftim]

See kubernetes/contributor-site#504

[sftim]

If we want a custom “article deleted” page, we can serve one. See #46323 for a hint about how to do that.

[sftim]

/hold

/approve
/lgtm

OK to unhold once the other removal PR has LGTM and approval.

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: e01200b86d57655e2ed9fb618923f62bffdaa38e

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sftim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• content/en/blog/OWNERS [sftim]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[sftim]

/hold cancel

[divya-mohan0209]

LGTM from me!

[chris-short]

@sftim As much as I would love to implement this, wouldn't it be simpler to have a Content Removed 404 page that we can redirect/alias off to? There's a strong desire to take these posts down sooner rather than later. Also, I would like to see this process documented.

[sftim]

As much as I would love to implement this, wouldn't it be simpler to have a Content Removed 404 page that we can redirect/alias off to? There's a strong desire to take these posts down sooner rather than later. Also, I would like to see this process documented.

Best discussed elsewhere I think. I wrote the suggestion before I knew the context for the removal.