Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C-0013 - clarify remediation #585

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Feb 25, 2024

User description

Overview

Resolves Issue #1606


Type

enhancement


Description

  • Enhanced the remediation section in C-0013-nonrootcontainers.json to clarify the use of runAsNonRoot, runAsUser, and runAsGroup for better security practices.
  • Updated the test section to provide more specific instructions on verifying the security settings related to running containers as non-root.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
C-0013-nonrootcontainers.json
Enhanced Remediation and Testing Instructions for Non-Root Containers

controls/C-0013-nonrootcontainers.json

  • Updated the remediation section to provide clearer instructions on
    setting runAsNonRoot, runAsUser, and runAsGroup.
  • Refined the test section to specify the verification of runAsUser,
    runAsNonRoot, and runAsGroup settings.
  • +2/-2     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
    @codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 25, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (1f4b04e)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 25, 2024

    PR Review

    (Review updated until commit ff9aaf0)

         PR feedback                    
    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because the changes are straightforward and limited to a single JSON file, focusing on enhancing the clarity of the remediation and testing instructions for non-root containers.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_reviewer] # /review #
    extra_instructions="""
    In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    How to enable\disable automation
    • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
    

    meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
    Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

    Auto-labels

    The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

    • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
    • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
    Extra sub-tools

    The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
    It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
    Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
    require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

    Auto-approve PRs

    By invoking:

    /review auto_approve
    

    The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

    To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

    [pr_reviewer]
    enable_auto_approval = true
    

    (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

    You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

    [pr_reviewer]
    maximal_review_effort = 5
    
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 25, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
    enhancement
    Add guidance on setting allowPrivilegeEscalation to false in the remediation section.

    Clarify the remediation section to include guidance on setting allowPrivilegeEscalation to
    false, as it is another important security practice to prevent privilege escalation.

    controls/C-0013-nonrootcontainers.json [10]

    -"remediation": "If your application does not need root privileges, make sure to define runAsNonRoot as true or explicitly set the runAsUser using ID 1000 or higher under the PodSecurityContext or container securityContext. In addition, set an explicit value for runAsGroup using ID 1000 or higher."
    +"remediation": "If your application does not need root privileges, make sure to define runAsNonRoot as true or explicitly set the runAsUser using ID 1000 or higher under the PodSecurityContext or container securityContext. In addition, set an explicit value for runAsGroup using ID 1000 or higher. Also, ensure `allowPrivilegeEscalation` is set to false to prevent any privilege escalation."
     
    Add a verification step for allowPrivilegeEscalation in the test section.

    In the test section, suggest adding a verification step for allowPrivilegeEscalation to
    ensure it is explicitly set to false, complementing the security measures outlined.

    controls/C-0013-nonrootcontainers.json [15]

    -"test": "Verify that runAsUser is set to a user id greater than 0 or that runAsNonRoot is set to true, and that runAsGroup is set to an id greater than 0. Check all the combinations with PodSecurityContext and SecurityContext (for containers)."
    +"test": "Verify that runAsUser is set to a user id greater than 0 or that runAsNonRoot is set to true, and that runAsGroup is set to an id greater than 0. Additionally, ensure `allowPrivilegeEscalation` is explicitly set to false. Check all the combinations with PodSecurityContext and SecurityContext (for containers)."
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Summary:

    • License scan: failure
    • Credentials scan: failure
    • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
    • Unit test: success
    • Go linting: success

    @codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot removed the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 26, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (ff9aaf0)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Persistent review updated to latest commit ff9aaf0

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 26, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
    enhancement
    Enhance the clarity and rationale in the remediation guidance.               

    To enhance clarity and precision, consider rephrasing the remediation guidance to
    explicitly mention the avoidance of using root privileges unless necessary, and to provide
    a brief rationale for using IDs 1000 or higher. This can help users understand not just
    the 'how' but also the 'why' behind the instructions.

    controls/C-0013-nonrootcontainers.json [10]

    -"remediation": "If your application does not need root privileges, make sure to define runAsNonRoot as true or explicitly set the runAsUser using ID 1000 or higher under the PodSecurityContext or container securityContext. In addition, set an explicit value for runAsGroup using ID 1000 or higher."
    +"remediation": "Avoid using root privileges unless absolutely necessary. When root privileges are not required, set `runAsNonRoot` to true or explicitly define `runAsUser` and `runAsGroup` with IDs 1000 or higher under the PodSecurityContext or container securityContext. Using IDs 1000 or higher helps in minimizing the risk of unauthorized system access."
     
    clarity
    Specify exact locations for compliance checks in the test description.       

    To improve the test description's clarity and actionability, consider specifying the exact
    locations where runAsUser, runAsNonRoot, and runAsGroup should be checked within the
    Kubernetes resource definitions. This can help users more effectively verify compliance
    with the control.

    controls/C-0013-nonrootcontainers.json [15]

    -"test": "Verify that runAsUser is set to a user id greater than 0 or that runAsNonRoot is set to true, and that runAsGroup is set to an id greater than 0. Check all the combinations with PodSecurityContext and SecurityContext (for containers)."
    +"test": "Ensure `runAsUser` is set to a user ID greater than 0, `runAsNonRoot` is true, and `runAsGroup` is set to an ID greater than 0 within both PodSecurityContext and container-level SecurityContext. Verify these settings in Deployment, StatefulSet, and DaemonSet resource definitions to ensure compliance."
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Summary:

    • License scan: failure
    • Credentials scan: failure
    • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
    • Unit test: success
    • Go linting: success

    @YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit 665127e into master Feb 29, 2024
    21 of 24 checks passed
    @YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 deleted the C-0013-improve-remediation branch April 14, 2024 10:46
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    Non-Root container false positive
    2 participants