-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add periodics and presubmits for k8s-1.21 #1192
Conversation
FYI @enp0s3 |
/retest |
@dhiller for 1.20 we splitted it into sigs, let's do the same for 1.21. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Looks good to me, only two nits inline.
@@ -284,7 +525,7 @@ presubmits: | |||
resources: | |||
requests: | |||
memory: "34Gi" | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So you are saying I should move the removal of trailing whitespaces to a new PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No :)
I am not clear what triggered this... is it your editor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, IntelliJ has a switch that automatically removes trailing whitespace.
@@ -674,7 +915,7 @@ presubmits: | |||
hostPath: | |||
path: /dev/vfio/ | |||
type: Directory | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
/reharse Does this work with new jobs ? |
/rehearse |
/hold Let's wait for rehearse |
Looks like 1.21-cgroupsv2 is broken
|
@qinqon I figure someone (TM) first needs to provide these on the kubevirt/kubevirt side. I didn't yet get to this. |
@qinqon now I get it. The cgroupsv2 is a separate provider that needs to get added to the kubevirtci. So maybe it's best to remove the cgroupsv2 at first and add it after it was created on kubevirtci. Makes sense? |
Clearly it does not make sense to have a job we cannot "exercise", let's remove those. |
humm and this ?
Maybe we need to change something at rehearsal to use the proper QUAY auth ? |
IMHO this should just work, otherwise it does not make sense to have a rehearsal of a job. Maybe there's sth wrong with the container proxy settings. Will have a look. |
Presubmits are reporting to GitHub but need to get triggered manually. Signed-off-by: Daniel Hiller <dhiller@redhat.com>
/rehearse |
1 similar comment
/rehearse |
/retest |
resources: | ||
requests: | ||
memory: "34Gi" | ||
- name: periodic-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.21 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we no longer need a provider lane, it would be empty as soon as all the tests are properly tagged (only 8 are left).
@@ -1,5 +1,209 @@ | |||
presubmits: | |||
kubevirt/kubevirt: | |||
- name: pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.21 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above, we don't need a provider presubmit.
- name: TARGET | ||
value: "k8s-1.21" | ||
- name: KUBEVIRT_E2E_FOCUS | ||
value: "Operator" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All the references to Operator
should be changed to [sig-operator]
now that kubevirt/kubevirt#5534 has landed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This Operator
string is still here, once it is changed good to go.
value: "Operator" | |
value: "[sig-operator]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dang, sorry for that 😕
Signed-off-by: kubevirt-bot <kubevirtbot@redhat.com>
/rehearse |
@fgimenez thanks for the review, fixed the issues. PTAL! |
Signed-off-by: kubevirt-bot <kubevirtbot@redhat.com>
/rehearse |
- name: TARGET | ||
value: "k8s-1.21" | ||
- name: KUBEVIRT_E2E_FOCUS | ||
value: "[sig-operator]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry that I didn't notice before but we are missing escapes for the square brackets like here https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/blob/master/automation/test.sh#L308
value: "[sig-operator]" | |
value: "\\[sig-operator\\]" |
- name: TARGET | ||
value: k8s-1.21 | ||
- name: KUBEVIRT_E2E_FOCUS | ||
value: "[sig-operator]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
value: "[sig-operator]" | |
value: "\\[sig-operator\\]" |
Signed-off-by: kubevirt-bot <kubevirtbot@redhat.com>
/rehearse |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
/hold
Thanks! Feel free to unhold when ready.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fgimenez The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@dhiller: The following tests failed, say
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/unhold |
/override rehearsal-pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.21-sig-compute |
@dhiller: Overrode contexts on behalf of dhiller: rehearsal-pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.21-sig-compute In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/override rehearsal-pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.21-operator |
@dhiller: Overrode contexts on behalf of dhiller: rehearsal-pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.21-operator In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dhiller: Updated the
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Presubmits are reporting to GitHub but need to get triggered manually.
FYI @EdDev
/cc @rmohr @fgimenez @qinqon