fix: autoscroll #1471
Merged
fix: autoscroll #1471
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
leoporoli
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2023
adschwartz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.84.1](0.84.0...0.84.1) (2023-10-04) ### Bug Fixes * autoscroll ([#1471](#1471)) ([9948fad](9948fad)) * bug where we passed cloud user id for cloud instance id ([#1465](#1465)) ([65b749c](65b749c)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Co-authored-by: kurtosisbot <kurtosisbot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
The autoscroll behvior was sticking even though the user was scrolling up and trying to escape it. With this change we are simplifying the scroll logic and it seems to be performing better.
Is this change user facing?
YES
References (if applicable):