This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.
Travis Octave issue #331
Merged
Travis Octave issue #331
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
amroamroamro
force-pushed
the
travis_octave
branch
2 times, most recently
from
60ce5f6
to
c488cb4
Compare
by removing a PPA with a conflicting graphicsmagick lib. also reverted to precise instead of trusty Ubuntu image.
amroamroamro
force-pushed
the
travis_octave
branch
from
c488cb4
to
80f0566
Compare
|
apologies for force pushing and triggering multiple failing builds, just trying to get this right ;) btw found this related report: travis-ci/travis-ci#7332 |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An attempt to fix the Travis build problem encountered in #329.
Apparently travis is pulling packages from this PPA (I think to install a newer version of Redis), but the PPA author recently added a newer version of graphicsmagick lib as well, which messed with Octave dependencies (the Octave version we install was compiled against GM version from the official repo).
Supposedly the semantic versioning of the GM package is compatible with octave requirement but maybe it was compiled with different flags breaking the ABI somehow.. This could explain why
apt-getdoesn't complain about a version mismatch but Octave rather fails at runtime to load the shared libs.This is all guessing on my part, let's see if the tests succeed of course :)
(I took hints from these issues: swig/swig#909 and swig/swig#949)