Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RNGkEpsilon for outdoor studies #53

Closed
TheodoreGalanos opened this issue Aug 18, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

RNGkEpsilon for outdoor studies #53

TheodoreGalanos opened this issue Aug 18, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@TheodoreGalanos
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

I noticed we are using k-epsilon as our model of choice for outdoor studies (v 0.0.2). Even though this is very easy for the user to assign before he/she runs the simulation I think giving a default value is a wise choice. From my experience, RNGkEpsilon behaves much better and has more accuracy for outdoor flows.

Way to set this: RASModel RNGkEpsilon;

in the turbulenceProperties file

@mostaphaRoudsari
Copy link
Member

This will be addressed as a part of #28.

mostaphaRoudsari added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 24, 2016
Addressed #28, #36, #37 and #53. Grasshopper components need to be
updated and organized before pushing this to the main repository.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants