You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed we are using k-epsilon as our model of choice for outdoor studies (v 0.0.2). Even though this is very easy for the user to assign before he/she runs the simulation I think giving a default value is a wise choice. From my experience, RNGkEpsilon behaves much better and has more accuracy for outdoor flows.
Way to set this: RASModel RNGkEpsilon;
in the turbulenceProperties file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I noticed we are using k-epsilon as our model of choice for outdoor studies (v 0.0.2). Even though this is very easy for the user to assign before he/she runs the simulation I think giving a default value is a wise choice. From my experience, RNGkEpsilon behaves much better and has more accuracy for outdoor flows.
Way to set this: RASModel RNGkEpsilon;
in the turbulenceProperties file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: