Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simple solution #4

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Simple solution #4

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

arkgil
Copy link

@arkgil arkgil commented May 11, 2016

Alright, so this seems to be working solution for our problem. It is based on our first idea to ask switch about flow statistics. It may be a little naive and definietly not scalable but it does its job:) Please comment and let me know if there is anything what could be improved in your opinion 馃憤

@mentels
Copy link

mentels commented May 16, 2016

This one won't be merged as I decided to pull an other solution. Anyway, an interesting thing to see would be to get rid of periodically sending flows_stats_request and instead rely on flow_removed message. In more detail: we could simply subscribe to this message and check the counters of a flow in the flow_removed message. According to the 7.4.2 chapter in the spec, all the counters are sent along the flow_removed message. This message is only sent when it is explicitly configured on the switch (see 7.3.10). I'm going to check how we can configure that in the OVS.

I think that having another option for managing our simple IDS algorithm would be great! Then we can compare 2 approaches.

I think that the best option is to integrate that with the solution from @mbSmaga by extracting common logic to sth like common_ids and then adding to separate, alternative modules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants