User Provided JuMP Models

[ccoffrin]

CC @jd-lara

Closes #400

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #401 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #401      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.83%   96.84%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          51       52       +1     
  Lines        6956     6974      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits         6736     6754      +18     
  Misses        220      220

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/core/base.jl	99.47% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
test/runtests.jl	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
test/model.jl	100% <100%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6473fef...5e1b451. Read the comment docs.

[frederikgeth]

cool feature!

[ccoffrin]

@rb004f, I think this feature addresses the gas-grid coupling you wanted to do.

[rb004f]

Yes, this is step towards what we need to do to support multiple infrastructures cleanly. At the moment, this specific aspect is addressed in GasGridModels.jl with this function, this will be cleaner.

function build_generic_model(pdata::Dict{String,Any}, gdata::Dict{String,Any}, power_model_constructor, gas_model_constructor, post_method; kwargs...)
gm = gas_model_constructor(gdata; kwargs...)
pm = power_model_constructor(pdata)

add_junction_generators(pm, gm)

# a bit of a hack for now
gas_grid_per_unit(gm.data, pm.data)

# unify all the optimization models... a little bit of a hack...
pm.model = gm.model
    
post_method(pm, gm; kwargs...) 
return pm, gm

end