Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert SVD workaround #230

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 23, 2022
Merged

Revert SVD workaround #230

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 23, 2022

Conversation

Michael-T-McCann
Copy link
Contributor

closes #212

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #230 (9d75aaa) into main (f7395cf) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 9d75aaa differs from pull request most recent head 4603e31. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4603e31 to get more accurate results

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #230      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.50%   92.52%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines        3455     3452       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         3196     3194       -2     
+ Misses        259      258       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.52% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
scico/functional/_norm.py 100.00% <100.00%> (+1.33%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f7395cf...4603e31. Read the comment docs.

if isinstance(s, tuple):
s = s[1]
return snp.sum(s)
return snp.sum(snp.linalg.svd(x, compute_uv=False))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps safer to leave in the full_matrices=False?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mysterious and intermittent test failures
2 participants