You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
minor: in the "Extrema" item, I suggest x_1, x_2, ... instead of x, y, ..., because these are lists of indefinite length (I assume).
more substantive: in the "Rounding functions" item, sorry, but I can't make heads or tails of it. What are n and t used for? And I gather they are optional in some cases. (I was trying to understand an \fpeval{round(...), 2)} example in Joseph's paper; the doc did not help me :(. Probably if I looked at the source I could understand, but ...)
On the formatting front, that lengthy "Rounding functions" list might be better as a sublist instead of a single long paragraph.
In "Random numbers" item: given Joseph's primitives rationalization, perhaps these are (will be, for TL) available in xetex now?
thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
regarding the actual content of xfp.pdf.
minor: in the "Extrema" item, I suggest x_1, x_2, ... instead of x, y, ..., because these are lists of indefinite length (I assume).
more substantive: in the "Rounding functions" item, sorry, but I can't make heads or tails of it. What are n and t used for? And I gather they are optional in some cases. (I was trying to understand an \fpeval{round(...), 2)} example in Joseph's paper; the doc did not help me :(. Probably if I looked at the source I could understand, but ...)
On the formatting front, that lengthy "Rounding functions" list might be better as a sublist instead of a single long paragraph.
In "Random numbers" item: given Joseph's primitives rationalization, perhaps these are (will be, for TL) available in xetex now?
thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: